General characteristicsThe PMMC G5 essentially seems to be the answer to the question "How would a company create a modern version of the M113 from the sketch?". This is not really a surprise, considering that FFG's history in the AFV market is mostly limited to maintenance and upgrading the M113, with delivering (or maintaining) more than 1500 vehicles to Germany, Denmark, Australia, Lithuania and Norway.
The G5 is designed to fit into the exact role currently occupied by the M113 in many armies around the globe. It can be used to transport troops, as mortar carrier, as command post, and for many more tasks. It is one of the multi-purpose designs, which aren't directly intended to take hits, but do all the
other tasks at the frontline. The usage of many (military and civilian) "off the shelf" components reduces costs.
The G5 is larger than the M113, with a total of 14.5 m³ armored interior volume and a maximum payload of 8.5 metric tons. The gross vehicle weight is 26.5 metric tons.
According to FFG, one of the main features of the PMMC G5 is the high level of protection, which includes integrated protection against (I suppose smaller) mines and IEDs. Armor protection with applique armor is offered against RPGs and heavy machine gun calibres.
|The G5's powerpack|
|The rubber band tracks of the PMMC G5|
A further area of improvments over the M113 and many other older light/medium AFVs is the improved vision concept. The driver is located in a dome extruding from the vehicle front. He has a large field of view thanks to several windows of armored glass, which seem to cover approximately an arc of 180°.
Different versions of close area surveillance systems/cameras can be mounted on the G5. The commander is provided with a cupola.
Modular designOne outstanding feature of the FFG is a modular design. While not being as modular as the Boxer from Artec GmbH or the (canceled) Splitterskyddad enhetsplattform, it is still a serious advantage for multi-purpose vehicles to be (semi-)modular.
|The modular concept of the G5 - module being taken out of the vehicle (CGI)|
It should be possible to develop another chassis (e.g. a wheeled chassis or a better protected one), which could support the same modules as the PMMC G5.
When not in use, the mission modules can be stored in standard ISO containers.
|One vehicle can be fitted with various different mission modules|
ArmamentThe original G5 prototype was either demonstrated unarmed - it appears likely that this version was able to install a pintle-mounted machine gun - or later with a FLW 200 remote weapon station from KMW. The FLW 200 can be fitted with 7.62 mm or 12.7 mm machine guns or alternatively with a 40 mm automatic grenade launcher.
|PMMC G5 with FLW 200 (mounting a 40 mm AGL)|
The FLW 200 was fitted on the left side of the hull, directly behind the driver's dome. The FLW 200+ however was mounted in the center of the vehicle (or even a bit to the right side of the hull). It is located on a extension to allow further gun depression.
|The PMMC G5 with FLW 200+ RWS|
Armor protectionIt seems that different armor sets have already been adapted for the G5. The basic G5 vehicle is an all-welded construction of metal - most likely aluminium or steel. In the FFG promo video for the G5, a version fitted with spaced applique armor can be seen.
|A screencap from FFG's promo video shows a spaced armor configuration|
|Tests of the mine protection kit of the G5|
|G5 presented with Barracuda camouflage|
The G5 has also been fitted with the Barracuda MCS from SAAB.
However the vehicle still seems to have a number of drawbacks worth mentioning:
- the weight increase over the M113
- the higher roof makes the vehicle taller than the M113 and some other tracked APCs
- the seats inside the vehicle seem to not be decoupled from the interior, which results in less protection against mines and IEDs
|The seats don't seem to be shock-proof|
Unfortunately the only known evaluation in which the G5 participated, was the Danish evaluation for a M113 replacement. While FFG had strong ties with the Danish government (i.e. by delivering several upgrades for the M113), the Danish army decided to go for a wheeled APC with the 8 x 8 Piranha 5.
Author's opinion: As previously mentioned, the G5 is not perfect. It lacks mine protected seats as used on the German Puma IFV or the Boxer. The vehicle is also not amphibious, which limits the market to which it can be sold.
Recently a lot of companies have offered multi-role vehicles based refurbished or new production Infantry Fighting Vehicles in the medium weight role. This includes BAE, which offers the CV90 Armadillo and the Bradley AMPV (as selected by the US Army), Rheinmetall (offering the Marder APC) and General Dynamics European Land Systems offering the ASCOD 2 APC.
With Denmark having chosen the Piranha 5, while Germany and the Netherlands are using the Boxer to replace most of their M113s, the market situation for the PMMC G5 is not ideal.
However there are still numerous versions of the Fuchs, M113, VAB, FV432 and the AIFV that should be replaced in the next decade - that is the chance for the PMMC G5 to shine.
There still seem to be hopes of selling the G5 to Germany, at least during a recent presentation in mid-May, a mobile command post version was demonstrated.
On the other hand, the G5's ancestors, the M113 G3 and M113 G4 upgrades would probably do the same job just a tiny bit worse, but for lower costs. The defence spendings in Europe have risen following the Ukraine conflict, but this money is focused on tanks and IFVs.
This design is good and thanks to you for presenting this wonderful article to us. Keep it up and keep posting wonderful and informational stuff.ReplyDelete
"the seats inside the vehicle seem to not be decoupled from the interior, which results in less protection against mines and IEDs"ReplyDelete
I seem to remember having read on the FFG website that the whole set of seats is hanging from the roof and thus is decoupled as a whole from the chassis ...
Recently, the Poles complained about not being part of the development of the new Eurotank.
I think not having another cook in that kitchen is reasonable.
But the Poles could be kept on board if they were licensed by FFG to produce the PMMC for a big joint order for central and eastern Europe.
Would be cheaper than doing so in Germany, and even more cheap if the thing could be mass produced for a bunch of European countries (each adding its own modules as desired. Basically, Germany would build Boxers for Poland etc, while Poland would build G5s for Germany, the Baltics etc.
What an amazing post. I really really liked it alot. FxitRightReplyDelete
Thank you for this great post. Apple Watch 3 Screen ReplacementReplyDelete
TrueKatana started as a small business in California and sold authentic Japanese samurai swords, Chinese swords, Anime & game replica swords in the main e-commerce marketplaces. We have big dreams.ReplyDelete